30,000-FOOT VIEW

Key considerations when doing evaluation

Re-imagining evaluation in our work:

Incorporating it into the initial program design

Frequently, evaluation is an after-thought. We need to re-imagine how we think about evaluation, not as something we have to do at the end of the project, but rather as something that helps us develop and strengthen our work and is incorporated throughout the program. It is useful to develop a research plan at the start of the project that includes evaluation and to continuously revisit the plan to ensure that the project is staying on track. As a best practice, evaluation should be integrated and ongoing throughout the stages of the strategy, as such evaluation should be considered during the planning and development stage and carried out through the activities all the way to post-programming. The people involved in designing the program also need to be designing the evaluation in such a way that it is coherent with the program’s values, methods, and approach.

Maximizing the effectiveness of programming

There are rarely enough resources, funding, and staff allocations for programming that addresses gender-based sexual violence. This makes it all the more important that we evaluate to see which of our programs are most effective at addressing our stated objectives so that we can allocate our limited resources to the most effective strategies. Conducting evaluation enables us to share data about what works and what doesn’t. Maximizing limited resources is crucial as the consequences of gender-based sexual violence impact a wide range of issues on campus, including most notably the physical and mental health of students and staff, student success rates and overall perception of institutions.

Using a trauma-informed approach

Consider how your evaluation design reflects the overall sensitivities in your programming. Evaluation strategies need to echo and reflect the same level of care as your strategy does, with respect to being trauma-informed and survivor-centered. Unfortunately, evaluation can be an area where sensitivity to the participants is not in alignment with the overall strategy. This occurs because evaluation designs are not often considered at the time of program development and as a result important sensitivities can be overlooked. For example, a participant receives a post-programming survey that asks about gender-based sexual violence in a triggering and/or upsetting manner because the people designing the evaluation are not in sync with the people developing the programming. Another example is that the facilitators conducting the strategies with participants have taken great care to create space that acknowledges peoples’ preferred pronouns but the evaluation plan employs gender binary language.

Tips on establishing a safer space with the participants:

Ask participants to share their name and anything that they feel is important for others to know in order to feel comfortable (e.g., asking participants to share their preferred/affirmed pronoun). It is important for you to take the lead and briefly go over some key safer space concepts:

  • Non-violence

  • No judgment

  • Respect

  • Confidentiality

  • No assumptions

  • Being mindful of how much space you are taking

  • Being accountable to these rules